Skip to main content
  1. Tags/

AI Liability

EU AI Act Liability Guide: Compliance, Enforcement & Professional Standards

The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) is the world’s first comprehensive AI law, and it applies to companies worldwide. If your AI system is used in the European Union, you’re subject to EU jurisdiction regardless of where your headquarters is located. For US companies serving European markets, this creates significant compliance obligations and liability exposure that cannot be ignored.

Res Ipsa Loquitur: When AI Failures Speak for Themselves

The Doctrine That Solves AI’s Black Box Problem # Artificial intelligence systems are often described as “black boxes”, systems where inputs go in and outputs emerge, but the internal reasoning remains opaque even to their creators. This opacity creates a fundamental litigation problem: how can an injured plaintiff prove what went wrong inside a system that nobody can fully explain?

AI Content Moderation & Platform Amplification Liability

The End of Platform Immunity for AI # For three decades, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shielded online platforms from liability for user-generated content. That shield is crumbling. Courts now distinguish between passively hosting third-party content, still protected, and actively generating, amplifying, or curating content through AI systems, increasingly not protected.

Precision Agriculture AI Standard of Care

AI in Agriculture: A Liability Frontier # Precision agriculture promises to revolutionize farming through artificial intelligence, optimizing pesticide applications, predicting crop yields, detecting plant diseases, and operating autonomous equipment. But this technological transformation raises critical liability questions that remain largely untested in courts. When AI-driven recommendations violate regulations, who bears responsibility? When autonomous farm equipment causes injury, how is liability allocated? And when algorithmic bias harms smaller operations, what remedies exist?