Maine State Bar Association AI Guidance#
The Maine State Bar Association has not yet issued formal guidance specifically addressing artificial intelligence use in legal practice. Maine attorneys must apply existing Rules of Professional Conduct to AI tools.
Regulatory Framework#
- Bar Association: Maine State Bar Association
- Website: mainebar.org
- Attorney Population: ~4,200 active attorneys
Core Ethical Obligations#
Competence (Rule 1.1)#
Attorneys must provide competent representation, which includes understanding AI tools’ capabilities and limitations before using them in client matters.
Confidentiality (Rule 1.6)#
Client information entered into AI systems must be protected. Attorneys should evaluate whether AI platforms adequately safeguard confidential data.
Supervision (Rules 5.1, 5.3)#
Supervising attorneys bear responsibility for ensuring proper AI use by subordinates and staff.
Candor (Rule 3.3)#
All AI-generated content must be verified for accuracy before submission to tribunals.
Practical Compliance Checklist#
AI Ethics Compliance
- Verify all AI outputs before client use or court submission
- Protect client confidentiality in AI platforms
- Maintain competence in AI tools used
- Document AI use in billing appropriately
- Supervise staff AI use
Has Maine issued AI-specific ethics guidance?
No. Maine attorneys should apply existing Rules of Professional Conduct and monitor the Maine State Bar Association for future guidance.
What rules apply to AI use in Maine?
Rules 1.1 (Competence), 1.6 (Confidentiality), 3.3 (Candor), 5.1 and 5.3 (Supervision) govern AI use in legal practice.
Can I use AI for legal research in Maine?
Yes, but you must verify all citations and analysis. AI hallucinations have led to sanctions in other jurisdictions.
Must I disclose AI use to clients in Maine?
While not explicitly required, transparency about significant AI use aligns with communication duties under Rule 1.4.